Blog Image: Generative AI: From Prototype to Production - Insights from Colin Eberhardt, CTO of Scott Logic at FinJS London

Generative AI: From Prototype to Production - Insights from Colin Eberhardt, CTO of Scott Logic at FinJS London

๐Ÿค– Why is there a gap between AI promise and delivery? ๐Ÿฆ What's holding financial services back in AI adoption? ๐Ÿ› ๏ธ How can we move from rapid prototyping to successful AI implementation?

Navigating the GenAI Revolution: From Prototype to Production

Navigating the GenAI Revolution: From Prototype to Production

Hey there, future AI innovators! Today, we're diving into how to transform those exciting prototypes into robust, production-ready systems in Gen AI. I recently attended a talk by Colin Eberhardt, CTO of Scott Logic, at FinJS London, and I'm eager to share some key insights with you.

The Adoption Conundrum

First things first: despite all the buzz around GenAI, we're still in the early stages of adoption. Surveys show that while about 70% of organizations are investigating AI, only 5-10% have actually deployed GenAI systems in production. Surprisingly, the financial services sector, traditionally at the forefront of AI adoption, seems to be lagging behind in GenAI implementation.

adoption_rates = {
    "Investigating": 70,
    "Piloting": 15,
    "In Production": 5
}

Why is GenAI Different?

Why is GenAI Different?

GenAI presents unique challenges compared to traditional AI systems:

  1. It's generative and creative, unlike the predictive models we're used to in finance.
  2. It's accessible to non-experts, putting powerful tools in the hands of users unfamiliar with AI intricacies.
  3. It's non-deterministic, which can be unsettling for both developers and end-users.

The Rapid Prototyping Paradox

The Rapid Prototyping Paradox

One of GenAI's most appealing features - rapid prototyping - can actually be a double-edged sword. Let's look at a simple example:

def simple_recipe_bot(ingredients):
    prompt = f"Create a recipe using: {', '.join(ingredients)}"
    return generate_ai_response(prompt)  # Placeholder for AI generation

# Prototype testing
print(simple_recipe_bot(["garlic", "fish", "olive oil"]))

While this prototype might work great with controlled inputs, it can produce unexpected results when faced with unusual ingredients or malicious inputs in a production environment.

Non-determinism and Unpredictability

def traditional_function(input):
    return input * 2  # Always predictable

def genai_function(input):
    # May produce different creative outputs each time
    return generate_creative_response(input)

This unpredictability is what gives GenAI its creative power, but it's also what makes it challenging to work with in production environments where consistency is often crucial.

From Prototype to Production: Key Steps

From Prototype to Production: Key Steps
  1. Extensive Testing: Move beyond "prompt engineering whack-a-mole." Develop comprehensive test suites that cover a wide range of use cases.
From Prototype to Production: Key Steps
  1. Break Down Complexity: Avoid "monolithic prompts." Instead, decompose your GenAI system into smaller, testable components.
def generate_recipe_name(ingredients):
    # AI logic for naming
    pass

def generate_ingredient_list(ingredients):
    # AI logic for listing ingredients
    pass

def generate_instructions(ingredients):
    # AI logic for creating instructions
    pass

def complete_recipe_bot(ingredients):
    name = generate_recipe_name(ingredients)
    ingredient_list = generate_ingredient_list(ingredients)
    instructions = generate_instructions(ingredients)
    return {
        "name": name,
        "ingredients": ingredient_list,
        "instructions": instructions
    }
  1. Risk Management: Define specific, testable criteria for your system's behavior. Vague concepts like "hallucination" or "safe AI" aren't enough.
def evaluate_recipe(recipe):
    criteria = {
        "uses_all_ingredients": check_ingredients_used(recipe),
        "safe_cooking_temps": check_cooking_temperatures(recipe),
        "clear_instructions": evaluate_instruction_clarity(recipe)
    }
    return all(criteria.values())

The Path Forward

The Path Forward

As we navigate this GenAI revolution, remember:

  1. Start with hands-on experimentation to understand the technology's nuances.
  2. Focus on taming the GenAI components before building surrounding infrastructure.
  3. Apply software engineering best practices to GenAI development.
  4. Clearly define and automate your evaluation criteria.

By following these principles, we can harness the creative power of GenAI while building systems that are reliable, safe, and truly revolutionary.

Rod Rivera

๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง Chapter

More from the Blog

Post Image: Liquid AI Shakes Up the Model Scene: Next-Gen Performance Unleashed!

Liquid AI Shakes Up the Model Scene: Next-Gen Performance Unleashed!

QuackChat: The DuckTypers' Daily AI Update brings you: ๐ŸŒŠ Liquid AI's revolutionary foundation models ๐Ÿš€ Benchmark-busting performance claims ๐Ÿง  MIT minds behind the innovation ๐Ÿ’ป Implications for AI developers and researchers ๐Ÿ”ฎ The future of AI model architecture Read on to dive deep into the waves of change!

Rod Rivera

๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง Chapter

Post Image: QuackChat: From Recipes to Road Tests: Why Berkeley's New Way of Testing AI Changes Everything

QuackChat: From Recipes to Road Tests: Why Berkeley's New Way of Testing AI Changes Everything

QuackChat explores how Berkeley's Function Calling Leaderboard V3 transforms AI testing methodology. Key topics include: - Testing Philosophy: Why checking recipes isn't enough - we need to taste the cake - Evaluation Categories: Deep dive into 1,600 test cases across five distinct scenarios - Architecture Deep-Dive: How BFCL combines AST checking with executable verification - Real-World Examples: From fuel tanks to file systems - why state matters - Implementation Guide: Practical walkthrough of BFCL's testing pipeline

Rod Rivera

๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง Chapter